well, what ever your negotiations with the speaker, should not be exposed to us!
the other day, we all should be having this slot session of topic 'A', but instead, the course's facilitator informed us that topic 'A' will be replace with another topic. so and so the speaker came out with topic 'B' explaining that this topic is more important and usefull to us, which in my opinion after the session is YES.
so i assume my fellow course members are very much looking forward to this topic 'A' that they asked the course's facilitator of whether that slot session for topic 'A' will be replaced. well, the facilitator said NO, and to my suprise, the facilitator "story-telling" us that the reason the speaker presents topic 'B' because he had no time preparing for the topic 'A' slides due to work commitment and because topic 'A' is the topic that he usually prensent and are confident-to. and that the speaker had promise her that he will discuss slightly about topic 'A' in the presentation, in which he didn't.
well, in my opinion, that wasn't necessary, because, it seems like down-grading the speaker. maybe the facilitator can surely put up some more concrete excuses to tell us instead of blowing it like that. because it sounds negative to me. hmmm maybe we should put more "ethics" in this ya? something to ponder...
No comments:
Post a Comment